A review of “Paterno” by Joe Posnanski.
You’ve read many reviews of “Paterno” by Joe Posnanski, so why read this one? I would be an arrogant turkey indeed if I were to think that anyone really cared about what I thought of the book. Probably, like many of you, I’ve run hot and cold on Joe Paterno through the years, the pace of the oscillations growing more rapid during the past 10 months. I found myself subscribing to many of the thoughts — or hatchet jobs, should I say? — of media writers and bloggists, as well as the opinions of my friends, many of whom were also vacillating about Joe. I’d never taken the time to think at length for myself about Joe, his principles, his high standards — which had been reduced to hypocrisy by the wonks who needed a living, breathing scapegoat upon whom to pin an alleged cover-up of the Jerry Sandusky crimes on campus.
Young and middle-aged sports writers who review a biography of an octogenarian are handicapped by the great gulf of goals and values between generations referred to colloquially as “The Greatest Generation” and “Generation X”. I, being of the much-maligned “Baby Boom Generation” — on the vanguard of it, yet — can better relate to the thoughts and feelings of an old man reflecting on his past successes and failures, as well as the crotchety moods, hanging on too long, and single-mindedness Paterno experienced in his later years. In no way am I comparing myself to Joe other than being a single generation removed from his.
Several reviewers seemed to want this book to be an expose of the entire Sandusky “cover-up” from the inside out. I’m happy they were disappointed. That was neither the original intent of the book, nor did Posnanski change course in mid-stream to incorporate a kangaroo court for Joe, which I presume those other writers wanted. There has been a certain blood lust in the wake of the scandal, with Paterno the target for the lynch mobs. I thought Posnanski did well to remain above the fray.
It is clear throughout the biography that Joe Paterno was not the “football above all” anti-hero the Freeh report wanted him to be. The following excerpt, beginning with a Paterno quote in the wake of Penn State’s first national championship season, 1982, says just the opposite.
“We have never been more united, more proud, and maybe it’s unfortunate that it takes a No. 1 football team to do that . . . . It bothers me to see Penn State football No. 1, then, a few weeks later, to pick up a newspaper and find a report that many of our academic departments are not rated up there with the leading institutions in the country.”
To Paterno, the way to make Penn State a great academic institution was obvious: they needed to recruit brilliant, aggressive, and vibrant teachers. “We have some,” he said. “We don’t have enough of them.” Then they needed to recruit the most promising and dazzling students, “the star students that star professors get excited about.” And the key was to raise money, more money, to endow chairs, to build science and computer labs, to fund scholarships, to build the nation’s best library. He was particularly passionate about the library: “Without a great library, we can’t be a great university.” Over the next twenty years, he and Sue would donate millions of dollars and raise millions more to build a world-class library that would be called the Paterno Library.
In challenging the board of trustees, and later challenging the faculty itself, Paterno was typically blunt. He praised some departments and called others lousy; he praised some professors and called others lazy. He said they needed to raise seven to ten million dollars over the next few months, while the opportunity was there. “I think we can be more than we are,” he insisted, “and make students better than they think they are.”
The vignettes of life in the Paterno home with Sue and the five Paterno children made for good contretemps, as well as comic relief. The one that sticks most in my mind was purported to be the seminal episode that caused Joe to impose a personal ban on swearing. A six-year old Jay was playing on the floor of the coach’s home office while Joe made recruiting calls. During one call, the recruiting target announced his plan to go elsewhere. Joe politely signed off saying the other school was a great institution and wishing the kid luck there. Then, he hung up and muttered, “Son of a bitch, I hope he hates it there!” After a subsequent recruiting call, Joe hung up without muttering. That was the six year-old Jay’s cue to exclaim, “Son of a bitch, I hope he hates it there!”
After that, Joe stopped cursing like a drunken sailor, using euphemoprofanity like “heck” and “darn”, “son of a gun” and “aw, fer cryin’ out loud!” Being a leader and a hero in many alumni eyes, he probably unintentionally caused many of his broad legions of fans to think twice about cursing.
As one would expect, Posnansky wrote much material about Paterno’s relationship with Jerry Sandusky, the two having coached side-by-side for 30 years. From the public’s point of view, they were working together; however, in reality it was nothing like that most of the time.
Paterno and Sandusky rarely agreed; they did not like each other. Paterno often fired Sandusky, and Sandusky often quit, and the two men clashed so violently in team meetings that other coaches expected a fight to break out.
Interestingly enough, Joe gave Sandusky the short shrift in his autobiography, mentioning him only once, “the same number of times he talked about Brooklyn Dodgers pitcher Sandy Koufax.” He didn’t like Sandusky. The feeling was mutual.
Sandusky, meanwhile, offered reporters funny but biting quotes about Paterno, like the time he mocked Paterno for always griping that defensive players need to have their hands up when running after the quarterback: “What else would they do? Have their hands down?” Looking back, many of the stories published about Paterno, even the most glowing, contain a slightly caustic quote from Sandusky. After a while, whenever an anonymous source took a shot at Paterno, well, Paterno just assumed it was Sandusky.
Joe thought Sandusky was a bit of a flake, but they put their heads together to come up with a perfect defensive plan to win the 1987 Fiesta Bowl against Miami for Penn State’s second Number One season. After that, Paterno felt that Sandusky had lost his coaching edge.
He grumbled to people that Sandusky was getting too full of himself. In Paterno’s mind, an earlier coach, Dan Radakovich, was the real coaching genius who made Penn State into “Linebacker U,” the ideal place for linebackers to play. He thought Sandusky was taking way too much credit. More to the point, Sandusky’s defense wasn’t stopping anybody. Even during the undefeated 1994 season, Paterno thought the defense was way too soft. The Nittany Lions gave up 21 points a game on average— too many, in Paterno’s book— and had gone undefeated only because the offense was so great. The defense was worse the next year. Paterno’s frustrations bubbled. He complained to friends that he did not know what to do about Sandusky. He began writing little notes to himself, things he wanted to say to Sandusky in meetings:
- Why is it you are the only one who, when a meeting starts, wants to know when it will end?
- Jerry, we ARE going to tighten up the ship.
- I knew I should have been worried when Jerry said Wisconsin got impatient running the ball against us. We have to stop people.
It was around that time that The Second Mile entered the picture, when Paterno felt that Sandusky was spending more time with his charity than he was with his coaching. Eventually, this would be the reason why Paterno would not recommend Sandusky to be his successor, and that is why Jerry left.
Posnanski wrote a chapter about Adam Taliaferro’s tragic injury and how Paterno reacted to it. As the 2000 season rolled around, Sandusky was gone and Joe felt a new energy. However 2000 turned out to be a bad year for Penn State and Paterno. First, in the off-season, Rashard Casey, the team QB, got into an off-campus fight with a police officer, and Joe backed him all the way, against the hoots and hollers of “hypocrite”. Although Casey was found not guilty, the season went downhill right from the start. Losses — including a real stinker 24-6 loss to Toledo — mounted, there was dissent among the coaching staff and worst of all, Adam Taliaferro had a paralyzing injury during the Ohio State loss about which doctors opined that he would never walk again. Joe was devastated, feeling that he had failed to protect Adam. But Joe being Joe, he played a major role in motivating Taliaferro through treatment and rehabilitation; he is now a walking, talking Philadelphia area lawyer who was also elected to the Penn State Board of Trustees by the alumni in 2012.
Against almost constant pressure from 2000 on, back in what many consider the “Dark Years” and beyond, Joe continued coaching. He didn’t know what he would do with himself if he retired. No one believed that he would ever quit; he would have to be hauled off the field with his boots on, having died on the field of combat. On the day in 2004 when president Graham Spanier, athletic director Tim Curley, and senior VP Gary Schultz famously joined Paterno at his breakfast table to ask him to consider retirement and give them a plan for smooth successorship, Joe’s temper flared:
Paterno recalled, Spanier cleared his throat and said that he was going to recommend to the board that 2005 be Paterno’s last year as coach.
At the end of his life, Paterno said, as if asking for forgiveness, “I have a temper. I shouldn’t have said what I said, but I was very angry. I had thought he came over to talk. But he already had made up his mind what he was going to do.”
Paterno put both hands on the table, looked Graham Spanier in the eye, and growled, “You take care of your playground, and I’ll take care of mine.”
Spanier looked at him with surprise. Paterno went on. Before the meeting, he had written notes to himself that seem to be for use in case the argument got hot:
- I am NOT going to resign.
- I am 77, but not old, and the arena is where I thrive.
- Loyalty— Commitment to Education— more than wins + losses.
- I’ve raised millions of dollars at this very table for the University.
- Realizing that graduation rate, etc., are what Penn State athletics are all about.
- I can rally the alumni. People in the country. We are special. We are Penn State.
All this and other scribbles were written in pencil. In blue pen, at the bottom of the yellow graph paper, he wrote what appears to be his final bid: “If I fail (7– 4, 8– 4), I retire.”
Of course, we all remember that the 2005 record was 12-1 and Penn State finished the post-season ranked number three.
Many thought Paterno should have quit back then, while he was ahead, but he hung on. His relations with the press and the public became crotchety and bitter. His health declined. He had to coach many games from the press booth. Still, the stubborn old coot didn’t feel it was time to hang them up. “What am I going to do? Mow the lawn? Play with my grandchildren?”
It took more than a few bad seasons to pry the old coach out of there. It took a scandal.
The take-down of Paterno has been covered eight ways to Sunday elsewhere. Posnanski does a pretty straight reporting job, capturing the emotions of Sue, Scott, and Jay along the way. And sadly, Joe’s final hours found their way into a biography whose subject was to have been a man still living.
In the epilogue, entitled “Encore”, Diana Paterno, Joe’s daughter, had the following to say:
“Since he died,” said Diana, “I have thought a lot, ‘What would Dad do?’ I thought about his character, the whole thing, the board of trustees, the way it ended. People talk about revenge or getting back at people or whatever. That’s not what Dad would have wanted. He would have wanted the truth to come out. That’s all.”
Amen to that.
Did Posnanski succeed in covering his subject? I believe he did. He did not inject his personal opinions and biases into it, which is what I want from a biographer. I believe that someone who reads this book fifty years from now will be able to construct an accurate mental image of Joseph V. Paterno, and his complexities as the coach, the father, and the man. That’s what I want from a biography.
Discover more from The Nittany Turkey
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Joe says
I finished the book this weekend and like you, thought it was a fair treatment of a man’s life. I think Posnanski did a better than expected job of portraying Paterno-what he set out to accomplish in the beginning, the successes and elevation to god-like status by the media during the middle period and the obvious decline in ability at the end.
If you followed his life to any degree, there were no surprises in his desire that football play second fiddle to the grander ambition of an education and development of maturity and life skills by his players.
What gave me a bit of a surprise was the acrimony he exhibited privately toward Sandusky for a rather long period of time and also that it appeared he played an active role in developing the defensive scheme that shut down Miami in the Fiesta Bowl-something for which he’s received little credit.
I stayed away from the media reviews of the book, because I knew there would be an expectation that Posnanski’s book would be all praise and hosanna’s regarding his life and would not unearth the damning evidence of Paterno’s involvement in the “cover-up” line they so believed he was central to and reported with no real factual basis. So I guess you could say I read it with no bias or preconceived expectations.
What I think I was left with was an honest assessment of his life and career and how the structure began to crumble during the last 10 or so years with some personal insight into how the Sandusky mess exploded.
Some points:
-As much as has been written about the impact of his father on his life, it appeared to me that Joe’s mother ruled the roost when he was growing up and perhaps had a much larger subliminal influence on his character throughout his life than most people thought.
-His concern about doing things the right way, his players getting an education and being prepared for life and his love of the university was portrayed by Posnanski as legitimate and real.
-He could be a real hard ass when he wanted and it seemed like his family life was almost nonexistent for most of his career.
-I thought Posnanski did a good job of depicting his rise to “Saint” status. The media articles he quoted quietly showed that this elevation came from outside sources and was something that Paterno did not want but used to his benefit when needed.
-I was always one of the individuals that felt Paterno stayed too long, but felt that he deserved to go out on his own terms. I think Posnanski did a great job showing that the failures of his teams in the early 2000’s led him to walk away from everything to focus on football and produce the stellar results in 2005 and 2008. But this more than anything precipitated his fall from grace with the media even though he was lauded for those two seasons.
-I was enthralled by the inside information that he presented for the period when the story first broke to his death. The recognition by the family that this could be the end, the realization that all of his allies were gone and how deep seated the support was to get rid of him was fascinating.
-There was no smoking gun, no personal memo or file that would exonerate him or condemn him just his recollections of events that took place 12 years earlier coming from a man who was becoming more and more physically and mentally impaired each passing day.
So, I think I feel okay saying that Posnanski’s book validates my opinions that
-he truly did care more about academics and individuals over football wins.
-he stayed on too long as coach.
-he outlived his allies in the media and the change to the 24 hour news cycle and his earlier abandonment of all activities other than football in the 2000’s contributed significantly to the media shark attack because no one really knew who he was in 2011-12.
-he acted based on what he was told by McQueary and thought he was handling things correctly. And I didn’t really grasp what was being told to him.
-Curley (maybe) is the only one that can clear up whether Paterno knew about ’98 and whether the “Coach” that is referred to in the infamous email quoted by Freeh is Sandusky or him.
-he did not deliberately cover anything up. I think the time Posnanski spent with him during his last months would have revealed that.
The Nittany Turkey says
Excellent review, Joe. You picked up on lots of things that I glossed over, so I urge any Turkey readers to read both reviews. Together, they tell the story well.
In my mind, the depiction of the Sandusky relationship alone was worth the price of the book.
Posnanski and Paterno’s version of the “firing” episode in 2004, if it is correct, blows yet another hole in the smooth Spanier media blitz script.
I’ll never forget that press conference in which Bob Flounders asked Joe whether it wasn’t time to hang up the black shoes. Joe was more visibly shaken than at any time I’d ever seen him. Posnanski captured that moment well.
Thanks again for your detailed commentary.
—TNT